It's over here, but starting elsewhere...
This blog is kaput here. RIP. Contact Gary Comstock at NCSU for updated information about blogging on research ethics.
A new generation of ethicists, researchers, and scholars meets here to develop a new vision for research ethics education (REE). For more about our ideas, please visit our online, interdisciplinary, international, collaborative, 1.0 credit, doctoral-level course, "OpenSeminar in Research Ethics"
This blog is kaput here. RIP. Contact Gary Comstock at NCSU for updated information about blogging on research ethics.
I am about to attend the Teaching Research Ethics workshop at the Poynter Center at IU Bloomington May 15-18. I would be interested to hear from any others who have attended this program, especially on any tips to make it as valuable as possible.
Please post news about LANGURE Sr. and Jr. Fellows here. For example, I see that Sue Ravenscroft has just been given a named chair at Iowa State. Congrats, Sue!
"A professor at a major state university has received federal funding for a program on ethics which life sciences professors from around the country will attend. The professor is a vegetarian on moral grounds. In making arrangements for the five-day program, he specifies that all of the (optional) lunches will be lacto-ovo vegetarian. Several of the participants are outraged. In fact, one sends a long, angry email message to professors across the country and to highly placed personnel in federal funding organizations, including the National Science Foundation, which funded the program." - Gary Varner, Ag Bioethics Forum 6 (1996) http://www.bioethics.iastate.edu/forum/nov.96pg5.html
What do you think of LANGURE? Any content we should add, delete, or revise? What about the design? Could you find what you were looking for? Suggestions for a more user-friendly site?
My suggestion would be to not use so much class time on the theories but on applied material. If you could use theories and apply them to how we can solve ethical problems, then fine. But even then, I’m not as interested in theory beyond broadening my horizons as much as I am interesting in knowing some of the rules and regulations that I will need to have an understanding of when I do my research. I also want to know what events and policies things I may encounter and ways of solving those problems.For a discussion of the approach LANGURE is currently taking, click here:
I like the approach of engaging sympathies by using "heels." One way to react to heels is with revulsion and an avowed decision to never do that oneself. But the heels of history, such as the Nazi or Tuskegee doctors, may be too removed from some of the more ordinary, garden-variety lapses in research ethics. How do you make the bridge between extreme historical cases and everyday practice?
Good question, AG. The Nazi experiments did not happen within my lifetime, not to mention the lifetimes of my students. Furthermore, those experiments were so vile and egregious as to seem to belong to a subject different from "research misconduct."
The Tuskegee case is within my lifetime, and students, particularly those from the U.s., seem to connect with it more directly than with the Third Reich example.
You asked, perceptively: How do we make the connection from these cases to the more common and mundane forms of misconduct? The heels play that role well. Heels commonly are guilty of F,F, or P, the most common forms of misconduct these days. By assembling a roster of examples from as many disciplines as possible, and preferably one from every discipline, the student will see that irresponsible and risky behaviors are not an artifact of a long-past era. Nor are they the sole province of people from other disciplines. They are recent, and they are present in my field.
What do you think?
G. Comstock
I used the material you posted on the web as the basis for a two-hour introduction to ethics for our first-year graduate students in chemistry (about 65 students) at the beginning of the semester. The most useful part, in their minds, was the plagiarism exercise. The least useful, in their minds, was the introduction to the research mission of the land-grant university and some of the more theoretical issues of ethics. They also wanted more applications.
The roster of examples works for me, let many flowers bloom to give people as many "hooks" on heeldom.
How should we address the opportunities and challenges for women and underrepresented minorities pursuing graduate degrees? In an era when some argue in court that Affirmative Action policies are not fair or no longer needed, should a research ethics course continue to address this topic?
Post here multiple choice questions over Lecture 3, "Four ethical principles."
Of what practical use are theoretical considerations in research ethics?